There are some really great truths being brought out in this article. Thanks for the research After reading it, I would like to add my 2 cents worth in mostly agreement. Let's examine a few things in the article.. 1st much of the article could be condensed if we start with the need for vaccines and the reason most of them are used. You have to first have a reason to pump poison ( and vaccines are proven poisons) into some one. That reason has been claimed to protect a person from a virus. Now you must first prove that a virus exists. That has never happened. You must prove that a non-existent virus is pathogen in humans. That has never happened . Then you must prove that a non-existent pathogen called a virus is transmissible between humans. That definitely never happened. So, much of the article could be condensed. Now, that over population thing, Look at a world map and find the tiny dot called Rhode Island if you can find something that small on a world map. The entire world population today would fit in that dot. Overpopulated? I think not. So let's look at The results of Bill Gates Vaccine agenda. How have the results been? Bill Gates himself said he made more money on vaccines than in any other venture (over a 20 to 1 return) financially. https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/01/23/bill-gates-and-the-return-on-investment-in-vaccinations-davos.html. He received extreme criticism in India for vaccine damage. The VARES report shows poisonous effects. We now know that people are damaged by a product that's actual need in the human body is an outright lie. Bill Gates father was the head of planned parent hood and is definitely a company that does not view life as sacred. So lets's look at how Mr. Bill gates views morality with his vaccines. After being take to the supreme court in Michigan, all 3 vaccine distributers for the covid vaccine admitted using aborted fetal cell lines for production and or testing of their products. So innocent babies died so people like Gates could make a profit on a lie. https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jul/08/what-clarence-thomas-said-about-fetal-cell-lines-a/ This being the case, People said they prayed about getting the jab and decided to do so on the spiritual guidance they received from the prayer. Maybe they prayed to the wrong God, the one that the Bible describes as the God of this world (2 Corinthians 4:4
New Living Translation
4 Satan, who is the god of this world,), because the God of the Bible said in his word, thou shalt not kill (or murder) Exodus 20:13 He also stated to not spread a false report Exodus 23:1 , He also stated (make sure of all things) 1Thessalonians 5:21 . It really comes down to the facts, 1. Bill Gates is an immoral liar that's in it for the profits. 2.There is no proven pathogen called a virus. 3. God does not approve of murdering babies and anyone accepting these shot, apparently do. With these facts in place,I see no need for arguments on this subject, but boy don't we have plenty of them.
Thanks for the comment. I don't want to sound harsh here. Please see this as friendly discussion. Based on the following response you gave, I wonder what you think the point of my article was. Your comment, "1st much of the article could be condensed if we start with the need for vaccines and the reason most of them are used."
My article is NOT about whether or not vaccines are useful, beneficial, etc. The whole point of the article is that I agreed (about vaccines' harmful nature) with people who decided to label me a "persecutor" or "enemy." People would feel as if they had more support with like-minded people if they were not splitting people into "all good" or "all bad" before asking, "what do you mean?" and " Do you believe ____?" questions. People just assume others disagree with them based on false beliefs. That's my point. My point is not about vaccines at all. That was all a vehicle to get to my point.
But I'll respond to the rest of your comment here since you put a lot of work into that and I want to explain my position. 1) I lean towards viruses not existing or if they do exist they're natural and healthy. I've written articles about the law of attraction and how we attract "disease" and German New Medicine. You may enjoy this: https://lawofattraction.substack.com/p/re-thinking-germ-theory
2) Concerning over-population. I've seen those videos about putting all our population into one little portion of land. We have plenty of land for everyone. I also believe in the law of attraction and we would make room for more people even if it ever got close. It's ridiculous that people worry about it and make large stupid decisions based on a faulty premise. We seem to agree, so I'm not sure why you brought that up.
You wrote, "With these facts in place, I see no need for arguments on this subject, but boy don't we have plenty of them."
I think people who believe that vaccines are helpful will have arguments with those who think they're not. That makes sense. People who disagree discussing and arguing about that disagreement makes sense. What does not make sense is people continually arguing and bringing up these points as if they're trying to convince others who ALREADY totally AGREE on the topic.
I do thank you for your input, but it seems wasted here in the sense that -> I, personally, <- ALREADY know this stuff. I don't need convincing. I don't need to be told all of this as if it's "new."
Also, thanks for your response. I did not intend to preach to the choir. You make some great points that I totally agree with. Hopefully you know that your article is read by many others and part of my reason for bringing out these points is to tell why I agree with your statements and since vaccines were mentioned and Bill Gates etc., I have studied these things for years. I wanted to bring to light that arguments about viruses are futile if you have no proof they exist. And we know by now there is no proof. I can agree also that people should find a way around arguing for arguments sake. I hope I am making my statements more clear and I had intended to show agreement with your statements and show the public reading this article why I agreed with it. Sometimes since I am not a well educated writer like many around me, I may not make my statements as clear as I should. So thank you for your article and I look forward to more of your future writings. I’m sure I will learn from them as well. Have a great day.
Thanks for clarifying. I am unsure if my article will be read by anyone who is pro-vaccine. Possibly in some future time frame if I got a huge amount of subscribers, maybe there is a slight possibility someone could come back to it and want to argue. But for now I think most of my subscribers are all aware that vaccines may (or definitely do) cause harm. They may differ on how much harm, but I don't really attract the sort of people who think vaccines are "all good" and their "savior."
I would say, unless someone is already arguing FOR vaccines, bringing up the damage they cause out of nowhere is jumping the gun. That's the sort of thing I was talking about in this article. A lot of people see Bill Gates and vaccines referenced in an article, post, tweet, or note, etc. and then they quickly go into "savior" mode talking about the harm of vaccines when no one cares (because the readers/listeners already know this).
It just seems like wasted time and energy. That time and energy could be put towards other things that are actually impactful. I also wrote about how it's impossible to change other people's minds, so I don't bother to try to go on about why something is "bad." I just let people be wrong since there's no convincing them otherwise. https://www.thedramaofitall.com/p/motivated-reasoning-keeps-us-from
There are some really great truths being brought out in this article. Thanks for the research After reading it, I would like to add my 2 cents worth in mostly agreement. Let's examine a few things in the article.. 1st much of the article could be condensed if we start with the need for vaccines and the reason most of them are used. You have to first have a reason to pump poison ( and vaccines are proven poisons) into some one. That reason has been claimed to protect a person from a virus. Now you must first prove that a virus exists. That has never happened. You must prove that a non-existent virus is pathogen in humans. That has never happened . Then you must prove that a non-existent pathogen called a virus is transmissible between humans. That definitely never happened. So, much of the article could be condensed. Now, that over population thing, Look at a world map and find the tiny dot called Rhode Island if you can find something that small on a world map. The entire world population today would fit in that dot. Overpopulated? I think not. So let's look at The results of Bill Gates Vaccine agenda. How have the results been? Bill Gates himself said he made more money on vaccines than in any other venture (over a 20 to 1 return) financially. https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/01/23/bill-gates-and-the-return-on-investment-in-vaccinations-davos.html. He received extreme criticism in India for vaccine damage. The VARES report shows poisonous effects. We now know that people are damaged by a product that's actual need in the human body is an outright lie. Bill Gates father was the head of planned parent hood and is definitely a company that does not view life as sacred. So lets's look at how Mr. Bill gates views morality with his vaccines. After being take to the supreme court in Michigan, all 3 vaccine distributers for the covid vaccine admitted using aborted fetal cell lines for production and or testing of their products. So innocent babies died so people like Gates could make a profit on a lie. https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jul/08/what-clarence-thomas-said-about-fetal-cell-lines-a/ This being the case, People said they prayed about getting the jab and decided to do so on the spiritual guidance they received from the prayer. Maybe they prayed to the wrong God, the one that the Bible describes as the God of this world (2 Corinthians 4:4
New Living Translation
4 Satan, who is the god of this world,), because the God of the Bible said in his word, thou shalt not kill (or murder) Exodus 20:13 He also stated to not spread a false report Exodus 23:1 , He also stated (make sure of all things) 1Thessalonians 5:21 . It really comes down to the facts, 1. Bill Gates is an immoral liar that's in it for the profits. 2.There is no proven pathogen called a virus. 3. God does not approve of murdering babies and anyone accepting these shot, apparently do. With these facts in place,I see no need for arguments on this subject, but boy don't we have plenty of them.
Thanks for the comment. I don't want to sound harsh here. Please see this as friendly discussion. Based on the following response you gave, I wonder what you think the point of my article was. Your comment, "1st much of the article could be condensed if we start with the need for vaccines and the reason most of them are used."
My article is NOT about whether or not vaccines are useful, beneficial, etc. The whole point of the article is that I agreed (about vaccines' harmful nature) with people who decided to label me a "persecutor" or "enemy." People would feel as if they had more support with like-minded people if they were not splitting people into "all good" or "all bad" before asking, "what do you mean?" and " Do you believe ____?" questions. People just assume others disagree with them based on false beliefs. That's my point. My point is not about vaccines at all. That was all a vehicle to get to my point.
But I'll respond to the rest of your comment here since you put a lot of work into that and I want to explain my position. 1) I lean towards viruses not existing or if they do exist they're natural and healthy. I've written articles about the law of attraction and how we attract "disease" and German New Medicine. You may enjoy this: https://lawofattraction.substack.com/p/re-thinking-germ-theory
2) Concerning over-population. I've seen those videos about putting all our population into one little portion of land. We have plenty of land for everyone. I also believe in the law of attraction and we would make room for more people even if it ever got close. It's ridiculous that people worry about it and make large stupid decisions based on a faulty premise. We seem to agree, so I'm not sure why you brought that up.
You wrote, "With these facts in place, I see no need for arguments on this subject, but boy don't we have plenty of them."
I think people who believe that vaccines are helpful will have arguments with those who think they're not. That makes sense. People who disagree discussing and arguing about that disagreement makes sense. What does not make sense is people continually arguing and bringing up these points as if they're trying to convince others who ALREADY totally AGREE on the topic.
I do thank you for your input, but it seems wasted here in the sense that -> I, personally, <- ALREADY know this stuff. I don't need convincing. I don't need to be told all of this as if it's "new."
Also, thanks for your response. I did not intend to preach to the choir. You make some great points that I totally agree with. Hopefully you know that your article is read by many others and part of my reason for bringing out these points is to tell why I agree with your statements and since vaccines were mentioned and Bill Gates etc., I have studied these things for years. I wanted to bring to light that arguments about viruses are futile if you have no proof they exist. And we know by now there is no proof. I can agree also that people should find a way around arguing for arguments sake. I hope I am making my statements more clear and I had intended to show agreement with your statements and show the public reading this article why I agreed with it. Sometimes since I am not a well educated writer like many around me, I may not make my statements as clear as I should. So thank you for your article and I look forward to more of your future writings. I’m sure I will learn from them as well. Have a great day.
Thanks for clarifying. I am unsure if my article will be read by anyone who is pro-vaccine. Possibly in some future time frame if I got a huge amount of subscribers, maybe there is a slight possibility someone could come back to it and want to argue. But for now I think most of my subscribers are all aware that vaccines may (or definitely do) cause harm. They may differ on how much harm, but I don't really attract the sort of people who think vaccines are "all good" and their "savior."
I would say, unless someone is already arguing FOR vaccines, bringing up the damage they cause out of nowhere is jumping the gun. That's the sort of thing I was talking about in this article. A lot of people see Bill Gates and vaccines referenced in an article, post, tweet, or note, etc. and then they quickly go into "savior" mode talking about the harm of vaccines when no one cares (because the readers/listeners already know this).
It just seems like wasted time and energy. That time and energy could be put towards other things that are actually impactful. I also wrote about how it's impossible to change other people's minds, so I don't bother to try to go on about why something is "bad." I just let people be wrong since there's no convincing them otherwise. https://www.thedramaofitall.com/p/motivated-reasoning-keeps-us-from