Discover more from The Drama of It All
Hating Survival of the Fittest
How progressives paradoxically, or idiotically hate that the fit survive
Previously I’ve explained how "Gendered Souls" in the Transgender Belief System Relate to Gnosticism. If you listen to James Lindsay any, eventually you’ll hear him talking about Gnosticism also. I believe that it is easy for Democrats, and atheists, to fall into some of these gnostic beliefs, such as “the world sucks.” Ok, I know we have some problems on earth. The gnostic part is believing that there was some evil or incompetent creator who destined us into this “evil world.”
If you want to say mankind was the “evil creator” then I can get on board with that. But the gnostics believed it was a god who created the messes we see. They scapegoat “sin” onto that god so they don’t have to take personal responsibility for the “sins” they commit that help create this mess.
The Drama of It All is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Democrats/Progressives will not consciously be understanding this or claim this, but the whole idea of “progressing” forward is because you think the old ways are wrong, bad, or evil.
As I see how the progressives continue to progress forward, I see the benefits of getting away from them and going back to the land, back to people who are grounded in reality.
This reminds me of an article I read about the difference between the “Virtuals” who spend time navel-gazing and working online, versus the reality-based “Physicals,” such as farmers. A farmer is very connected to the earth; a farmer is grounded in reality. The “Virtuals” could care less about reality and look forward to what they can create even if it’s impossible. After looking for the article, and finding it to link here, I’m pleased to see Gnosticism mentioned. There’s a connection, and if people don’t know about Gnosticism it’s worth researching.
Hating Survival of the Fittest
Paradoxically, or idiotically, democrats/progressives want to get progress without the “survival of the fittest” reality of this world. I think this is one of those things they think God or reality got wrong. They hate that this world was built on survival of the fittest (or natural selection) because it means people who are not fit, or the plain lazy people in the world, will not succeed and may even die.
The Democrat political party wants the government to play “savior” in the drama triangle. In order to have a political party they need people to play the role of victims. Otherwise, they’d be out of a job. If only the fit survived, they would have no need of the Democrats to “save” them from anything. The Democrats need the unfit to survive and, unconsciously or consciously, will do whatever they have to in order to keep that going.
When I first heard about COVID and the idea that people had to lockdown I was baffled. Of course, by then I had heard enough doctors explaining co-morbidities, things people could take personal responsibility for (taking vitamin D & Zinc, exercising, etc), and how most of the time COVID wasn’t that bad. But the general public hadn’t heard that because of censorship.
The idea that healthy people should have COVID parties and get herd immunity made sense. You put the fittest people together and get them sick, they manage it, and you can help stop the spread before it got worse. That idea was laughed at, mocked, and censored on social media.
Society’s plan was the exact opposite, lock people down away from gyms and the summer sunlight (lowering vitamin D) levels. The plan made people less fit and less capable to handle the disease in order to save the weak of our population. I’ve also discussed how this was basically social communism, taking the health from the fit and giving it to the weak to even us out.
Another way the progressives of the day hate the idea of survival of the fittest is in the censoring of doctors and scientists and anyone sharing those ideas that don’t fit the mainstream narrative.
If you want to build a bridge but censor anyone who says something in the plan is faulty, then the bridge will not be built to last. Who wants to drive across a bridge built by censors? Who wants to fly in a plane built by censors? In a way, people do fly in planes “built by censors” today because pilots were pressured to take a vaccine that may cause blood clots. Our plane-flying experiences are now weakened because of censorship.
The only way to get the best product (or to get to the truth/reality of a thing) is to allow people to critique it. All of the critiques if true, should be dealt with and fixed. All of the critiques if false, will be ignored because the truth will stand through the tests of questions.
But anyone who censors critics fears them because they don’t have faith that they, themselves, are correct. They might find out that they’re a fraud. As I mentioned, this is why those who identify as transgender, don’t like it when someone uses a different pronoun to refer to them than their preferred pronouns. If they truly believed in who they say they are, they wouldn’t care if people misgendered them.
The truth will win in the end, because our reality is one based on survival of the fittest. Logically it makes sense that if people have all of the data, they will choose to believe the truth if they are to survive in a reality such as ours.
If you ignore the data, like the “Virtual” class wants to do, eventually the reality catches up to you. There are plenty of people very vocal about getting vaccinated, who very privately dealt with side effects. There are plenty of people who have had “gender affirmation” surgery, who had the ending of their honeymoon effect and now had to deal with the reality of the situation, which is why suicide inclinations go up after cosmetic surgery.
Wanting The Weak To Survive
Democrats/Progressives want the weak to survive. I know it sounds rough to suggest that some people won’t make it, but that’s life. It’s what happened. We can’t stop the reality of life from happening even if we hate it.
The reality is the weak don’t survive as the fit do. When COVID hit, the weak (elderly) were the ones who didn’t make it in greater numbers than the rest of the age groups. I understand wanting to do everything possible to help them survive through it, but as a society we made the wrong decisions on how to best help them.
In a reality where the weak don’t survive, we should focus on helping people become strong and resilient instead of thin-skinned snowflakes and weaklings. The best help for everyone (when COVID started) would have been to individually take personal responsibility for their health and the health of their loved ones. We wouldn’t have censored the information saying taking vitamin D and zinc helps, and exercising helps, and we would have helped people exercise more, not less. We wouldn’t have shut down the businesses of people who needed that money to take care of themselves. We wouldn’t have printed more money as stimulus checks that would cause inflation years later and weaken our economy.
The people “leading” our society are actually followers of bad scientists and doctors who are only happy that their competition (the smart and honest ones) was censored. The leaders have motivated reasoning to believe the failures, because, as I said earlier, they need there to be a “victim” class to stay in their jobs as “saviors.”