For someone who claims to be able to hold opposing truths and multiple perspectives, your writing does a great job at generalizing and homogenizing a group of people based on very lose descriptors of “left” and “woke” and attributing an imaginary (as in artificial) group of people with dishonest intentions and behaviours. This feels slippery to me.
For someone who claims to be able to hold opposing truths and multiple perspectives, your writing does a great job at generalizing and homogenizing a group of people based on very lose descriptors of “left” and “woke” and attributing an imaginary (as in artificial) group of people with dishonest intentions and behaviours. This feels slippery to me.
For someone who claims to be able to hold opposing truths and multiple perspectives, your writing does a great job at generalizing and homogenizing a group of people based on very lose descriptors of “left” and “woke” and attributing an imaginary (as in artificial) group of people with dishonest intentions and behaviours. This feels slippery to me.